Value decomposition has long been a fundamental technique in multi-agent reinforcement learning and dynamic programming.

However, 2DGS suffers from severe aliasing artifacts when rendering at different sampling rates than those used during training, limiting its practical applications in scenarios requiring camera zoom or varying fields of view. We identify that these artifacts stem from two key limitations: the lack of frequency constraints in the representation and an ineffective screen-space clamping approach. To address these issues, we present AA-2DGS, an anti-aliased formulation of 2D Gaussian Splatting that maintains its geometric benefits while significantly enhancing rendering quality across different scales. Our method introduces a world-space flat smoothing kernel that constrains the frequency content of 2D Gaussian primitives based on the maximal sampling frequency from training views, effectively eliminating high-frequency artifacts when zooming in. Additionally, we derive a novel object-space Mip filter by leveraging an affine approximation of the ray-splat intersection mapping, which allows us to efficiently apply proper anti-aliasing directly in the local space of each splat.

The Mamba-type neural networks have gained significant popularity recently. To effectively and efficiently establish model architectures of Mamba, it is natural to introduce Neural Architecture Search (NAS) methods into Mamba. However, existing NAS methods tailored for Mamba are training-based, leading to substantial time and computational resource expenditure. To address this issue, and considering that Mamba2 is an improved version of the original Mamba, we propose a training-free NAS method specifically designed for Mamba2. Based on rank collapse in stacked State Space Duality (SSD) blocks, we design a proxy that only requires the computation of the transformation matrix and its gradient between two tensors within the network. Additionally, we develop a corresponding search space and introduce a novel approach for determining adjustable hyperparameter ranges. Experimental results show that our method outperforms all existing training-free NAS approaches in terms of both ranking correlation and the performance of search results for Mamba2 architecture. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first training-free NAS method designed for Mamba-type architectures.

Selective prediction [Dru13, QV19] models the scenario where a forecaster freely decides on the prediction window that their forecast spans. Many data statistics can be predicted to a non-trivial error rate distributional assumptions or expert advice, yet these results rely on that the forecaster may predict at any time. We introduce a model of Prediction with Limited Selectivity (PLS) where the forecaster can start the prediction only on a subset of the time horizon. We study the optimal prediction error both on an instance-by-instance basis and via an average-case analysis. We introduce a complexity measure that gives instance-dependent bounds on the optimal error. For a randomly-generated PLS instance, these bounds match with high probability.

Fast adversarial training (FAT) has been considered as one of the most effective alternatives to the computationally-intensive adversarial training. Generally, FAT methods pay equal attention to each sample of the target task. However, the distance between each sample and the decision boundary is different, learning samples which are far from the decision boundary (i.e., less important to adversarial robustness) brings additional training cost and leads to sub-optimal results. To tackle this issue, we present vulnerable data-aware adversarial training (VDAT) in this study. Specifically, we first propose a margin-based vulnerability calculation method to measure the vulnerability of data samples. Moreover, we propose a vulnerability-aware data filtering method to reduce the training data for adversarial training thus improve the training efficiency. The experiments are conducted in terms of adversarial training and robust neural architecture search on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and ImageNet-1K. The results demonstrate that VDAT is up to 76% more efficient than state-of-the-art FAT methods, while achieving improvements regarding the natural accuracy and adversarial accuracy in both scenarios. Furthermore, the visualizations and ablation studies show the effectiveness of both core components designed in VDAT.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have rapidly transitioned from academic research to core components of real-world applications, especially since the emergence of high-profile foundation models such as OpenAI's GPT series [17, 140], Google Gemini [9], Meta Llama [175, 176], Anthropic Claude [12], Alibaba Qwen [11, 210, 209], and Doubao [172]. Today, LLMs are deployed across an unprecedented range of sectors--from web search and code assistants to legal, educational, and healthcare domains--reaching hundreds of millions of end users globally. The rapid adoption of LLMs has ushered in a new era of AI-powered services, but it also brings serious safety and security risks. These risks manifest in multiple forms, ranging from misinformation and privacy leaks to adversarial attacks that exploit model vulnerabilities. In particular, a growing body of work shows that carefully crafted jailbreak prompts can bypass alignment constraints, inducing models to produce sensitive, illegal, or harmful content. Alarmingly, recent studies report that such attacks achieve success rates exceeding 90% even on flagship models such as GPT-4, Claude 3, and DeepSeek-R1 [124, 42, 154, 118]. The outputs generated through these attacks could be used for malicious purposes, underscoring the urgent need for close attention and mitigation.

The ongoing evolution of AI paradigms has propelled AI research into the agentic AI stage. Consequently, the focus of research has shifted from single agents and simple applications towards multi-agent autonomous decision-making and task collaboration in complex environments. As Large Language Models (LLMs) advance, their applications become more diverse and complex, leading to increasing situational and systemic risks. This has brought significant attention to value alignment for agentic AI systems, which aims to ensure that an agent's goals, preferences, and behaviors align with human values and societal norms. Addressing socio-governance demands through a Multi-level Value framework, this study comprehensively reviews value alignment in LLM-based multi-agent systems as the representative archetype of agentic AI systems. Our survey systematically examines three interconnected dimensions: First, value principles are structured via a top-down hierarchy across macro, meso, and micro levels. Second, application scenarios are categorized along a general-to-specific continuum explicitly mirroring these value tiers. Third, value alignment methods and evaluation are mapped to this tiered framework through systematic examination of benchmarking datasets and relevant methodologies. Additionally, we delve into value coordination among multiple agents within agentic AI systems. Finally, we propose several potential research directions in this field.

Comparison-based preference learning has become central to the alignment of AI models with human preferences. However, these methods may behave counterintuitively. After empirically observing that, when accounting for a preference for response $y$ over $z$, the model may actually decrease the probability (and reward) of generating $y$ (an observation also made by others), this paper investigates the root causes of (non) monotonicity, for a general comparison-based preference learning framework that subsumes Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), Generalized Preference Optimization (GPO) and Generalized Bradley-Terry (GBT). Under mild assumptions, we prove that such methods still satisfy what we call local pairwise monotonicity. We also provide a bouquet of formalizations of monotonicity, and identify sufficient conditions for their guarantee, thereby providing a toolbox to evaluate how prone learning models are to monotonicity violations. These results clarify the limitations of current methods and provide guidance for developing more trustworthy preference learning algorithms.